Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 649% more |
| Protein | 5.24 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 161% more |
| Carbs | 0.62 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 72.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 48087% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 19% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.