Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians)
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 47 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 61% more |
| Protein | 4.21 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 4% more |
| Carbs | 6.96 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 67% more |
| Fat | 0.28 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 85% more |
| Fiber | 6.3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 125% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 7 mg | Equal |
| Calcium | 366 mg ★ | 17 mg | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 2053% more |
| Iron | 1.16 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 22% more |
| Potassium | 1270 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 638% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.