Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians)
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 47 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Protein | 4.21 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 109% more |
| Carbs | 6.96 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Fat | 0.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 87% more |
| Fiber | 6.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 91% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 366 mg ★ | 38 mg | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 863% more |
| Iron | 1.16 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 68% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 1270 mg ★ | 475 mg | Lambsquarters, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 167% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.