Lambsquarters, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lambsquarters, raw
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lambsquarters, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 43 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 64% more |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
| Carbs | 7.3 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 66% more |
| Fat | 0.8 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Fiber | 4 g ★ | 2.8 g | Lambsquarters, raw has 43% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lambsquarters, raw has 514% more |
| Calcium | 309 mg ★ | 17 mg | Lambsquarters, raw has 1718% more |
| Iron | 1.2 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 80 mg ★ | 0 mg | Lambsquarters, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 452 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lambsquarters, raw has 163% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.