Lambsquarters, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lambsquarters, raw
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lambsquarters, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 43 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Protein | 4.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lambsquarters, raw has 109% more |
| Carbs | 7.3 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lambsquarters, raw has 433% more |
| Fiber | 4 g ★ | 3.3 g | Lambsquarters, raw has 21% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lambsquarters, raw has 19% more |
| Calcium | 309 mg ★ | 38 mg | Lambsquarters, raw has 713% more |
| Iron | 1.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lambsquarters, raw has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 80 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Lambsquarters, raw has 308% more |
| Potassium | 452 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.