Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians)
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 48 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Protein | 4.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) has 102% more |
| Carbs | 7.47 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Fat | 0.16 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) has 7% more |
| Fiber | 5.2 g ★ | 3.3 g | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) has 58% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 349 mg ★ | 38 mg | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) has 818% more |
| Iron | 1.15 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) has 67% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Potassium | 1070 mg ★ | 475 mg | Lambsquarters, steamed (Northern Plains Indians) has 125% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.