McDONALD'S, BIG MAC vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, BIG MAC
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 257 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC has 186% more |
| Protein | 11.82 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC has 488% more |
| Carbs | 20.08 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Fat | 14.96 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC has 9873% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Sugar | 3.97 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sodium | 460 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC has 1178% more |
| Calcium | 116 mg ★ | 38 mg | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC has 205% more |
| Iron | 2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | McDONALD'S, BIG MAC has 190% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Potassium | 181 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.