Mortadella, beef, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mortadella, beef, pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Mortadella, beef, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 311 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Mortadella, beef, pork has 246% more |
| Protein | 16.37 g ★ | 2.01 g | Mortadella, beef, pork has 714% more |
| Carbs | 3.05 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Fat | 25.39 g | 0.15 g ★ | Mortadella, beef, pork has 16827% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1246 mg | 36 mg ★ | Mortadella, beef, pork has 3361% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.4 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Mortadella, beef, pork has 103% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 163 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.