Mushrooms, portabella, exposed to ultraviolet light, grilled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mushrooms, portabella, exposed to ultraviolet light, grilled
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Mushrooms, portabella, exposed to ultraviolet light, grilled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 29 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Protein | 3.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | Mushrooms, portabella, exposed to ultraviolet light, grilled has 63% more |
| Carbs | 4.44 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Fat | 0.58 g | 0.15 g ★ | Mushrooms, portabella, exposed to ultraviolet light, grilled has 287% more |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Sugar | 2.26 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 0.4 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 437 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.