Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 424 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 371% more |
| Protein | 6.99 g ★ | 2.01 g | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 248% more |
| Carbs | 76.2 g ★ | 20.71 g | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 268% more |
| Fat | 10 g | 0.15 g ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 6567% more |
| Fiber | 3.4 g ★ | 3.3 g | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 3% more |
| Sugar | 23 g | 6.48 g ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 255% more |
| Sodium | 659 mg | 36 mg ★ | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 1731% more |
| Calcium | 79 mg ★ | 38 mg | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 108% more |
| Iron | 4.13 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Nabisco, Nabisco Grahams Crackers has 499% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 177 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.