Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated vs Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated
5 wins
🏆
Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties
6 wins
| Nutrient | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 351 kcal | 160 kcal ★ | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 119% more |
| Protein | 0.16 g | 2 g ★ | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties has 92% more |
| Carbs | 86.09 g ★ | 8.53 g | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 909% more |
| Fat | 0.06 g ★ | 14.66 g | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 6.7 g ★ | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties has 93% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.66 g | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties has 100% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg | 7 mg ★ | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 43% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 12 mg | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 108% more |
| Iron | 2.17 mg ★ | 0.55 mg | Noodles, chinese, cellophane or long rice (mung beans), dehydrated has 295% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 10 mg ★ | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties has 100% more |
| Potassium | 10 mg | 485 mg ★ | Avocados, raw, all commercial varieties has 98% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.