Oheloberries, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oheloberries, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Oheloberries, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 28 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Carbs | 6.84 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fat | 0.22 g | 0.15 g ★ | Oheloberries, raw has 47% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.09 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Vitamin C | 6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Potassium | 38 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.