OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta has 134% more |
| Protein | 15.33 g ★ | 2.01 g | OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta has 663% more |
| Carbs | 12.28 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
| Fat | 11.23 g | 0.15 g ★ | OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta has 7387% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 2.68 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Sodium | 625 mg | 36 mg ★ | OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta has 1636% more |
| Calcium | 95 mg ★ | 38 mg | OLIVE GARDEN, chicken parmigiana without pasta has 150% more |
| Iron | 0.58 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 277 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.