Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Protein | 2.22 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned has 10% more |
| Carbs | 13.94 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fat | 0.71 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned has 373% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 4 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 38% more |
| Sodium | 381 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned has 958% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 0.91 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pasta with tomato sauce, no meat, canned has 32% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 192 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.