Pate, chicken liver, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pate, chicken liver, canned
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Pate, chicken liver, canned Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 201 kcal 90 kcal Pate, chicken liver, canned has 123% more
Protein 13.45 g 2.01 g Pate, chicken liver, canned has 569% more
Carbs 6.55 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more
Fat 13.1 g 0.15 g Pate, chicken liver, canned has 8633% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 386 mg 36 mg Pate, chicken liver, canned has 972% more
Calcium 10 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more
Iron 9.19 mg 0.69 mg Pate, chicken liver, canned has 1232% more
Vitamin C 10 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more
Potassium 95 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.