Pate, liver, not specified, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pate, liver, not specified, canned
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Pate, liver, not specified, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 319 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pate, liver, not specified, canned has 254% more |
| Protein | 14.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pate, liver, not specified, canned has 606% more |
| Carbs | 1.5 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Fat | 28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pate, liver, not specified, canned has 18567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 697 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pate, liver, not specified, canned has 1836% more |
| Calcium | 70 mg ★ | 38 mg | Pate, liver, not specified, canned has 84% more |
| Iron | 5.5 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pate, liver, not specified, canned has 697% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Potassium | 138 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.