Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 1% more |
| Protein | 0.43 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Carbs | 21.95 g ★ | 20.71 g | Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 6% more |
| Fat | 0.17 g | 0.15 g ★ | Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 13% more |
| Fiber | 6 g ★ | 3.3 g | Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 82% more |
| Sugar | 10.61 g | 6.48 g ★ | Plums, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 64% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.17 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Vitamin C | 10.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Potassium | 364 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.