Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
Nutrient Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 94 kcal 90 kcal Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free has 4% more
Protein 1.44 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more
Carbs 21.31 g 20.71 g Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free has 3% more
Fat 0.35 g 0.15 g Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free has 133% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 14.18 g 6.48 g Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free has 119% more
Sodium 187 mg 36 mg Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free has 419% more
Calcium 52 mg 38 mg Puddings, tapioca, ready-to-eat, fat free has 37% more
Iron 0.11 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more
Vitamin C 0.3 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more
Potassium 70 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.