Pumpkin, canned, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pumpkin, canned, without salt
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Pumpkin, canned, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 34 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Carbs | 8.09 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Fat | 0.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pumpkin, canned, without salt has 87% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 3.3 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 26 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pumpkin, canned, without salt has 101% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Potassium | 206 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.