Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 18 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more
Protein 1.49 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more
Carbs 3.55 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more
Fat 0.19 g 0.15 g Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 27% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 280 mg 36 mg Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 678% more
Calcium 78 mg 38 mg Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 105% more
Iron 0.77 mg 0.69 mg Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 12% more
Vitamin C 10.5 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more
Potassium 488 mg 475 mg Purslane, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 3% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.