Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
5 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 64% more |
| Protein | 8.91 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 71% more |
| Carbs | 23.34 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 3.57 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 339% more |
| Fiber | 1 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Sugar | 10.34 g | 0 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Sodium | 304 mg | 74 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 311% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 15 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 207% more |
| Iron | 3.07 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 195% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 41% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.