Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 76% more |
| Protein | 8.91 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 64% more |
| Carbs | 23.34 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 5.28 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 197% more |
| Fiber | 1 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Sugar | 10.34 g | 0 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Sodium | 304 mg | 90 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 238% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 8 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 475% more |
| Iron | 3.07 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 582% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.