Restaurant, family style, onion rings vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, family style, onion rings
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, family style, onion rings | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 356 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 133% more |
| Protein | 4.89 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 80% more |
| Carbs | 40.72 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 0% more |
| Fat | 19.28 g | 5.28 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 265% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 0% more |
| Sugar | 4.68 g | 0 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 0% more |
| Sodium | 692 mg | 90 mg ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 669% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg ★ | 8 mg | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 163% more |
| Iron | 0.71 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 58% more |
| Potassium | 142 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.