Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 5% more |
| Protein | 7.35 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 76% more |
| Carbs | 15.75 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Fat | 9.04 g | 3.57 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 153% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Sugar | 0.46 g | 0 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Sodium | 473 mg | 74 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 539% more |
| Calcium | 75 mg ★ | 15 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 400% more |
| Iron | 0.87 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 41% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.