Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 14% more |
| Protein | 7.35 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 70% more |
| Carbs | 15.75 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Fat | 9.04 g | 5.28 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 71% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Sugar | 0.46 g | 0 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Sodium | 473 mg | 90 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 426% more |
| Calcium | 75 mg ★ | 8 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 838% more |
| Iron | 0.87 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 93% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.