Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians)
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 162 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 80% more |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Carbs | 38.22 g ★ | 20.71 g | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 85% more |
| Fat | 0.34 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 127% more |
| Fiber | 24.1 g ★ | 3.3 g | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 630% more |
| Sugar | 2.58 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 169 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 345% more |
| Iron | 1.06 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 54% more |
| Vitamin C | 426 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Rose Hips, wild (Northern Plains Indians) has 2073% more |
| Potassium | 429 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.