Rowal, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rowal, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Rowal, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 111 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Rowal, raw has 23% more |
| Protein | 2.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Rowal, raw has 14% more |
| Carbs | 23.9 g ★ | 20.71 g | Rowal, raw has 15% more |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rowal, raw has 1233% more |
| Fiber | 6.2 g ★ | 3.3 g | Rowal, raw has 88% more |
| Sugar | 14.1 g | 6.48 g ★ | Rowal, raw has 118% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 2.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Rowal, raw has 219% more |
| Vitamin C | 25.8 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Rowal, raw has 32% more |
| Potassium | 131 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.