Sandwich spread, meatless vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sandwich spread, meatless
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Sandwich spread, meatless | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 149 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sandwich spread, meatless has 66% more |
| Protein | 8 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sandwich spread, meatless has 298% more |
| Carbs | 9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Fat | 9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sandwich spread, meatless has 5900% more |
| Fiber | 3.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Equal |
| Sugar | 1.9 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Sodium | 630 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sandwich spread, meatless has 1650% more |
| Calcium | 44 mg ★ | 38 mg | Sandwich spread, meatless has 16% more |
| Iron | 1.5 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sandwich spread, meatless has 117% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 340 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.