Scrapple, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Scrapple, pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Scrapple, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 213 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Scrapple, pork has 137% more |
| Protein | 8.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | Scrapple, pork has 301% more |
| Carbs | 14.06 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Fat | 13.87 g | 0.15 g ★ | Scrapple, pork has 9147% more |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Sugar | 0.2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Sodium | 482 mg | 36 mg ★ | Scrapple, pork has 1239% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 1.89 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Scrapple, pork has 174% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Potassium | 158 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.