Semolina, unenriched vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Semolina, unenriched
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Semolina, unenriched | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 360 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Semolina, unenriched has 300% more |
| Protein | 12.68 g ★ | 2.01 g | Semolina, unenriched has 531% more |
| Carbs | 72.83 g ★ | 20.71 g | Semolina, unenriched has 252% more |
| Fat | 1.05 g | 0.15 g ★ | Semolina, unenriched has 600% more |
| Fiber | 3.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Semolina, unenriched has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 1.23 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Semolina, unenriched has 78% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 186 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.