Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, with salt
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 21 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Protein | 1.14 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Carbs | 5.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Fat | 0.05 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 247 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, with salt has 586% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 37 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, with salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.