Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 22 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Protein | 1.14 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Carbs | 5.23 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 75% more |
| Fat | 0.05 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 97% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg | 7 mg ★ | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt has 57% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg ★ | 17 mg | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt has 29% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 37 mg ★ | 0 mg | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.