Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 22 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Protein | 1.14 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Carbs | 5.23 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Fat | 0.05 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 37 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Sesbania flower, cooked, steamed, without salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.