Sesbania flower, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sesbania flower, raw
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Sesbania flower, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 27 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Protein | 1.28 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Carbs | 6.73 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Fat | 0.04 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 15 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.84 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sesbania flower, raw has 22% more |
| Vitamin C | 73 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Sesbania flower, raw has 272% more |
| Potassium | 184 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.