Soymilk, chocolate, nonfat, with added calcium, vitamins A and D vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Soymilk, chocolate, nonfat, with added calcium, vitamins A and D
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Soymilk, chocolate, nonfat, with added calcium, vitamins A and D | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 44 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
| Protein | 2.47 g ★ | 2.01 g | Soymilk, chocolate, nonfat, with added calcium, vitamins A and D has 23% more |
| Carbs | 8.51 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Fat | 0.04 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 3.65 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Sodium | 57 mg | 36 mg ★ | Soymilk, chocolate, nonfat, with added calcium, vitamins A and D has 58% more |
| Calcium | 116 mg ★ | 38 mg | Soymilk, chocolate, nonfat, with added calcium, vitamins A and D has 205% more |
| Iron | 0.35 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 105 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.