Squash, Indian, cooked, boiled (Navajo) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, Indian, cooked, boiled (Navajo)
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, Indian, cooked, boiled (Navajo) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 16 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Protein | 0.31 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Carbs | 3.22 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Fat | 0.15 g ★ | 0.15 g | Equal |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 2.02 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.