Squash, Indian, raw (Navajo) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, Indian, raw (Navajo)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, Indian, raw (Navajo) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 26 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Protein | 0.52 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Carbs | 5.64 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Squash, Indian, raw (Navajo) has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 3.54 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sodium | 20 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 0.17 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Potassium | 205 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.