Squash, winter, butternut, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, winter, butternut, raw
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, winter, butternut, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Protein | 1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Carbs | 11.69 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 2.2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 48 mg ★ | 38 mg | Squash, winter, butternut, raw has 26% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Squash, winter, butternut, raw has 1% more |
| Vitamin C | 21 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Squash, winter, butternut, raw has 7% more |
| Potassium | 352 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.