Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Protein | 2.48 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Carbs | 10.81 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Fat | 0.62 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 68% more |
| Fiber | 4.9 g ★ | 2.8 g | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 75% more |
| Sugar | 4.9 g | 0.87 g ★ | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 463% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg | 7 mg ★ | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 14% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 17 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 68% more |
| Vitamin C | 9.5 mg ★ | 0 mg | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 358 mg ★ | 172 mg | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 108% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.