Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Protein | 2.48 g ★ | 2.01 g | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 23% more |
| Carbs | 10.81 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Fat | 0.62 g | 0.15 g ★ | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 313% more |
| Fiber | 4.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 4.9 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Vitamin C | 9.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Potassium | 358 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.