Stew, moose (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Stew, moose (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Protein | 6.6 g ★ | 4.4 g | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 50% more |
| Carbs | 6 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 72% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 74% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 222 mg | 7 mg ★ | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 3071% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 1.52 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 2% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 100 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.