Stew, moose (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Stew, moose (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Protein | 6.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 228% more |
| Carbs | 6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 233% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 222 mg | 36 mg ★ | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 517% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 1.52 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Stew, moose (Alaska Native) has 120% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 100 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.