Sugars, maple vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sugars, maple
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Sugars, maple | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 354 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Sugars, maple has 195% more |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 98% more |
| Carbs | 90.9 g ★ | 21.3 g | Sugars, maple has 327% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 84.87 g | 0.87 g ★ | Sugars, maple has 9655% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg | 7 mg ★ | Sugars, maple has 57% more |
| Calcium | 90 mg ★ | 17 mg | Sugars, maple has 429% more |
| Iron | 1.61 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Sugars, maple has 8% more |
| Potassium | 274 mg ★ | 172 mg | Sugars, maple has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.