Sugars, maple vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sugars, maple
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Sugars, maple | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 354 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sugars, maple has 293% more |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Carbs | 90.9 g ★ | 20.71 g | Sugars, maple has 339% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sugars, maple has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 84.87 g | 6.48 g ★ | Sugars, maple has 1210% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 90 mg ★ | 38 mg | Sugars, maple has 137% more |
| Iron | 1.61 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sugars, maple has 133% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 274 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.