Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack has 1% more |
| Protein | 1.65 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Carbs | 21.12 g ★ | 20.71 g | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack has 2% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack has 33% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 5 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack has 47% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.89 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack has 29% more |
| Vitamin C | 26.4 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Sweet potato, canned, vacuum pack has 35% more |
| Potassium | 312 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.