Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple has 194% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 69.6 g ★ | 20.71 g | Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple has 236% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 42 g | 6.48 g ★ | Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple has 548% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg | 36 mg ★ | Syrups, table blends, pancake, with 2% maple has 69% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 0.07 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 6 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.