Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 24 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Protein | 2.72 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 38% more |
| Carbs | 4.02 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 81% more |
| Fat | 0.41 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 79% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 86 mg ★ | 17 mg | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 406% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 21% more |
| Vitamin C | 35.5 mg ★ | 0 mg | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 460 mg ★ | 172 mg | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 167% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.