Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 24 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Protein | 2.72 g ★ | 2.01 g | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 35% more |
| Carbs | 4.02 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Fat | 0.41 g | 0.15 g ★ | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 173% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 86 mg ★ | 38 mg | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 126% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 71% more |
| Vitamin C | 35.5 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Taro leaves, cooked, steamed, without salt has 81% more |
| Potassium | 460 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.