Toppings, butterscotch or caramel vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Toppings, butterscotch or caramel
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Toppings, butterscotch or caramel | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Toppings, butterscotch or caramel has 140% more |
| Protein | 1.21 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Carbs | 57.01 g ★ | 20.71 g | Toppings, butterscotch or caramel has 175% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 57 g | 6.48 g ★ | Toppings, butterscotch or caramel has 780% more |
| Sodium | 341 mg | 36 mg ★ | Toppings, butterscotch or caramel has 847% more |
| Calcium | 49 mg ★ | 38 mg | Toppings, butterscotch or caramel has 29% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 66 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.