Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 21% more |
| Protein | 19.58 g ★ | 4.4 g | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 345% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.42 g | 1.92 g ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 286% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 108 mg | 7 mg ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 1443% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.99 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 34% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.